Consulting · strategy · market intelligence
Expert skills from the plaza, industry output templates, and professional libraries you subscribe to — not assemble. Frame faster, cite live, deliver briefs and memos the room actually uses.
Judgment
Recommend wait until Q3
Enterprise cycle still too long to enter clean
Evidence
Comp A · 10-K excerpt · p. 34
Contract length extended to 14.2 months
48h→4h
problem framing
1 tap
live citation
Top 5
signals ranked
How it runs
Mandate library · EV charging
Intake1 · Clip sources
2 · Frame the problem
Sector frame
Audience
Steering committee
Decision
Enter market vs. wait
Deliverable
48h workshop pre-read
Window
48 hours
Market map
Product advantages
Skills, templates, and plaza libraries — one analyst workflow.
Support
Thesis
Counter
Expert skills
Same corpus → multiple formats
DeliveryDecision memo
Recommend wait until Q3
Live citation
“Enterprise tier repriced ↑12%”
→ Comp A pricing page · clipped Mar 12
Stakeholder scan
Recommendation on page one
Every claim links to a passage in your library
Industry templates
Library plaza
Knowledge graph · AI View
Consulting and industry analysts don't organize work as PDF folders. They hold sector frames, market maps, driver trees, and hypothesis boards in their head. AI View makes that structure visible, clickable, and citable — so the graph is the analysis, not a diagram after the fact.
Frame the problem first
What is in scope? Who plays where? What are we actually deciding?
Sector boundary and market map nodes — players, archetypes, value-chain positions, and open questions — before the reading pile becomes a deck.
New EV mandate Tuesday, client workshop Friday: graph the sector frame in two hours, not three days of unordered PDFs.
Mechanism thinking
What actually moves the thesis? Which drivers are first-order vs. noise?
Driver tree hierarchy — outcome at the top, causal drivers below, each linked to evidence passages. See mechanics, not bullet lists.
Pricing change overnight: traverse from revenue driver node to the filing excerpt that supports or breaks it.
Hypothesis-driven judgment
What do we believe, what contradicts it, and what is still unknown?
Hypothesis nodes with support, counter-evidence, and gap edges — the same board seniors keep in their head, now on the corpus.
Steering committee tonight: open the hypothesis node — recommendation, trade-offs, and cited appendix in one view.
Universe & positioning
Who is in the peer set? How do they differ on motion, pricing, and GTM?
Company clusters and positioning axes — tier-1 / tier-2 universe, not a flat folder of IR PDFs. Click a company to ask scoped questions.
Comp matrix for Monday: select the peer cluster node — Agent compares only those sources, every cell citable.
Defensible in the room
Where did that number come from? Can I open the passage in one tap?
Claim → source → passage chain on the graph. Live challenge becomes navigation, not tab hunting.
Client asks mid-slide: click the claim node — the exact sector report page opens with the citation chip.
Thesis maintenance over time
What changed since last week — and does it break our view?
New signal nodes attach to affected hypotheses. OpenClaw feeds the graph; you see delta on the map, not seventeen headlines in Word.
Weekly watch: only nodes with changed support/counter edges surface — draft delta brief from the diff, not a rewrite.
Why not folders?
Pain analysis
Before the room
48h to workshop — days of reading, no view the client can actually push on
In the room
"Where did that number come from?" — the room waits while you search, not cite
After the headline
Every headline feels urgent — none tells you if your thesis still holds
Resources
Workflows for competitive intelligence, market research, and executive briefs.
Why Mindar
Less re-collection, clearer judgment, deliverables the room can challenge — with evidence behind every line.
Judgment context
Hypothesis cards, conclusion versions, and open questions persist in the library
Public signal intake
OpenClaw agent scrapes watchlists on a schedule into source cards
Delivery trust
Every claim cites sources; counter-evidence stays visible
Cold-start speed
Industry starter kit + problem map in hours, not days
Get started
Trace every recommendation to a passage in your library — not a paraphrase from chat.
From sources in this library only: frame a 48h market entry pre-read — problem map, three provisional conclusions, ten open questions, and a client-safe executive summary with citations.
