01
Highlights trapped in PDF readers
All solutionsPaper review
Research · synthesis workflow
From paper pile to a review section co-authors can verify
Batch-import PDFs, protocols, and lab notes. Compare methods with citations, map the field in AI View, and export literature reviews and lab slides — every claim traceable to a passage.
Paper synthesisMethods compareCited exportReview maps
Mindar · Researchers
Paper review40+
papers compared
Export
cited sections
1 map
methods view
Three steps are enough
Step 1 / 3
Curate a project research library
Import PDFs, preprints, protocols, and meeting notes into one workspace — searchable across the full paper set, not trapped in annotation apps.
Sound familiar?
Does this sound familiar?
02
Methods comparison does not scale
03
Draft claims without visible evidence
Why Mindar fits this workflow
Built for researchers
Evidence-linked synthesis
Every comparison step ties back to passages in your paper set — not model memory.
Field structure at a glance
AI View clusters methods, datasets, and debates so you see gaps before writing.
Shared libraries for co-authors
Team permissions, comments, and version history on the same research corpus.
Paper library
PDFs, supplements, and lab notebooks indexed together.
Methods comparison
Side-by-side analysis with citation chips.
Research map
Concept and paper relationships in AI View.
Review exports
Reports, grant outlines, and lab meeting slides.
Literature reviewMethods briefLab slidesGrant outline
Mindar Agent
One agent product — three ways it works for everyone
Every use case shares the same intersection: grounded Ask, skill-driven Produce, and OpenClaw Watch. Skills — including expert templates from the plaza — plug into the modes your workflow needs most.
Ask
Grounded answers from your library
Scoped Q&A with citations — verify claims against the sources you trust, not the open web. Memory keeps context across sessions.
Produce
Skills turn corpus into deliverables
Workflow skills and expert templates assemble briefs, quizzes, scripts, and memos from the same library — library-grounded only.
Watch
OpenClaw keeps tasks running
Scheduled collection and delta updates on a watchlist — surface what changed your judgment, not another inbox of headlines.
Recommended agent
Research Partner
Task packs below combine library scope, skills, and deliverable templates for this workflow.
ask
Methods matrix
Compare methods and datasets across papers with citation chips your PI can open.
Skill · Cross-paper compare
produce
Review section
Draft synthesis sections and lab slides from the same paper corpus.
Skill · Lit review export
watch
Preprint watch
Scheduled digest of new preprints mapped to your review outline.
Skill · New paper digest
Why Researchers choose Mindar
Methods traceability
Cross-paper comparison with citation chips
Knowledge structure
Visual maps + searchable corpus
Evidence chain
Co-authors open the exact PDF passage
Publication outputs
Review sections and lab slides from Studio
Team alignment
Shared libraries with permissions
How Researchers use Mindar
Thesis related-work chapter due — 40 papers imported, methods still unclear.
“I import the full set, ask Mindar to compare methods and identify gaps, then export a review section with inline citations my advisor can click through.”
Draft review section with verifiable citations in days, not weeks.
Common questions
Libraries scale to large corpora — batch upload PDFs and supplementary files for a project or review.
Make every claim in your draft traceable to a source.
From my research library only: compare main methods across these papers, identify open gaps, and outline a literature review section with citations.